THE PROCESS
THE IDEAS
PROJECTS
FOR SCIENTISTS
TEAM
LOGIN

Submitted Ideas


SUBMIT OCEAN PROBLEM

0

MMPA vs. fishery sustainability

Posted by Merit McCrea | California, United States

The Marine Mammal Protection Act and other similar legislation protects top predators. Fisheries and rebounding populations of these predators compete for common resources, and while fisheries can be restrained, wild predators, cannot legally.
What will be the result when these two competing agents collide? Will any level of fishing still be sustainable when prey organisms evolved to withstand only the effect of their natural predators are once again faced with the full force of maximum predator populations?
How will managers decide between fisheries and nature if such a choice became necessary? Via MPA based allocation for natural predators and lethal removal elsewhere? No action, forcing fisheries to face depredation pressures(rendering some hook and line methods ineffective), and predators a cyclical Malthusian demise during lean times?


Please Post Your Comment





Ready to Submit your own idea?


SUBMIT OCEAN PROBLEM


This website or its third-party tools use cookies, which are necessary to its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy. If you want to know more or withdraw your consent to all or some of the cookies, please refer to the Cookie Policy. By closing this banner, scrolling this page, clicking a link or continuing to browse otherwise, you agree to the use of cookies.